An anonymous submitter gave us this update on everyone’s favourite Transgendered scam artist, Caitlin Martin K7VO/K9NI:
—-
HamSexy Readers–Watch your wallet and member!
The transexual radio/computer scammer Caitlyn Martin is on the loose and has relocated back to her old haunt near Raleigh, North Carolina. She is staying away from the airwaves, and has refocused her efforts to get the confidence of computer readers. Leopards rarely change their spots and since no restitution has been done it is likely this scammer will poke it to computer readers via O’reilly.com. O’reilly has been contacted and is investigating so we’ll see which direction this goes. We all know his/her “deduct-a-dick-from-me” operation is not over yet (ouch, I don’t have much but the thought hurts the same) and that means some more sexy change scams are likely to occur.
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2654 (his/her O’reilly blog listing)
http://www.k7vo.net/ (latest update)
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2654
A condition of her bail that was set, was a “no computer use” restriction. She is not even supposed to be using her computer.
See for yourself
http://wcca.wicourts.gov/courtRecordEvents.xsl;jsessionid=5B1304A6EF29E40F5A01BB7C84545383.render2?caseNo=2006CF000106&countyNo=42&cacheId=97D9037044623244778FF29EC1341CA2&recordCount=2&offset=1&linkOnlyToForm=false&sortDirection=ASC
OK, so how do we get her violation reported? To the court clerk?
If she wants to ever clear her reputation, you’d think that, now that she’s been caught, she’d at least behave while all the attention’s on her…!!!
ka1zfe is wrong. The terms of her bond were modificed to allow her to use a computer for work, to find work, or to assist in her own defense. Her O’Reilly blog is work related. Don’t believ me? Yes, you can report her to the Clerk of the Court in Oconto Co., WI or to the Oconto Co. D.A.
Please remember that she is innocent until proven guilty. Please also remember that you could be held legally liable if you interfere with her employment or post false information. I seriously doubt anyone here knows for sure whether or not she’s had surgery, especially the anonymous poster of this article. He’s even got her name spelled incorrectly.
sw4me (legalbeagle) is right. The terms of her bond were ammended to allow computer use. It is not false information that she had a “no computer use” clause to her bond. It was not the whole truth, missing the amendment to the bond, and for that, I stand corrected.
On another note, legalbeagle should let her defend herself. If she is innocent, then she should explain her actions to all of those people that she stole money from.
Did she tell you that she was home and confronted, back in August 06, at her home by a local ham? She was heard stating that she shipped the items to those people? If it were identity theft, as you stated before, then why would she state, in her own words, that she had mailed the items that she recieved money for? The identity theft position is not going to stand as all of the facts come out.
I understand you are trying to defend your friend, but get all of your facts straight. If you are a real lawyer, my advise to you is keep your legal oppinions between yourself and your potential client.
Giving free, unsolicited (threatening) and acusatory legal advice is poor form for a lawyer, if you are one.