The shit that comes into our Inbox….

—–Original Message—–
From: Bryan Wadsworth [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 5:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MURS-OPEN] Digest Number 1204

TOO FUNNY LT…. I’M GONNA 4WARD A COPY OF THIS EMAIL TO HAMSEXY FOR A GUD LOL…. WHO KNOWS MAYBE THEY WILL START MURSEXY… .. WB9MCW BRYAN IN CHICAGOLAND

> Lowell Thompson wrote:
>
> …truly “private” conversations…
> I can see an opportunity for a new website… “MursSexy”
>>
>> —– Original Message —–
>> From: ahoecker
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: [MURS-OPEN] Digest Number 1204
>>
>> Even the TEKK NT-10 has Voice Inversion. That was the major change
>> between the Nt-10 and the NT-20 models (or is it the other way around).
>>
>> This is not at all like coded encryption but it is usable. You must
>> remember if the channel is in use
>> it doesn’t matter if you use a coded message or not. You still must
>> monitor and wait for the channel to clear.
>>
>> As long as you are not talking about Top Secret stuff (Like if you are
>> going to eat at Mc D’s or Burger King) you have to ask what do I need
>> this for????
>>
>>August
>>>
>>> Will210 wrote:
>>>> I’d like to see voice scrambling on GMRS, FRS and MURS radios. Then
>>>> you’d have truly “private” conversations (ie, not like CTCSS).
>>>
>>> This is already available, assuming you buy the right radio.
>>>
>>> Several companies make FRS radios with inversion scrambling…
>>> Kenwood makes one, Motorola makes at least 2(the T6210 and T6220), and >>> I believe that other companies(Cobra?) do as well.
>>> As for GMRS and MURS, there are radios available with scramblers that
>>> can be used for those services as well(but it’s easier for GMRS than
>>> for MURS to find legal radios that are suitable).